US bonds, REITs & gold for Indian investors: worth it?
Beyond US equity: bonds, REITs, gold ETFs. The honest analysis of when each adds value for Indians, and where Indian alternatives win.
By Vested
US equity is the default reason Indian residents use the LRS to invest abroad. But there are three other US-listed asset classes that occasionally come up: US Treasury bonds, US REITs (real estate investment trusts), and gold ETFs. Each has a real case, and each has Indian-specific friction that often makes it less attractive than it sounds.
This post walks through all three with honest analysis.
US bonds: the case against, mostly
What US bonds are
US Treasury bonds (and bond ETFs like AGG, BND, VGIT) are debt instruments issued by the US federal government or US corporations. They pay regular interest (called "coupon" payments) and return principal at maturity.
Bond ETFs hold a basket of bonds, paying out interest as monthly distributions.
Why someone might want them
Standard portfolio theory says equity volatility should be balanced by bond stability. The classic 60/40 portfolio (60% equity, 40% bonds) has been a foundation of US retirement investing for decades.
For an Indian investor: the US bond allocation could theoretically:
- Smooth equity volatility.
- Provide inflation-stable cash flow in retirement.
- Hedge against US deflation scenarios.
Why it doesn't work well in practice
Three structural problems for Indians:
Problem 1: Yield differential
| 10-year yield (early 2026) | |
|---|---|
| US Treasury | ~4.3% |
| Indian Government Securities | ~7.0% |
Indian government bonds yield ~270 basis points more than US bonds. For an Indian investor, holding US bonds means accepting a substantially lower yield than equivalent Indian instruments.
Problem 2: Currency volatility wrecks the "stability" thesis
Bonds are supposed to be the stable leg. But USD/INR has 5–6% annual volatility — more than US bond price volatility itself. Adding currency to a "stable" asset turns it into a volatile asset.
If you want true stability in INR terms, you need INR bonds — government securities, top-rated corporate bonds, PPF, or NPS.
Problem 3: Tax treatment is harsh
Indian tax on foreign bond income:
- Coupon (interest) payments: taxed as interest income at slab rate, not as the more favorable dividend / capital gains category. For 30% slab, that's 31.2% effective.
- Capital gains on sale: foreign equity rules apply (slab rate < 24 months, 12.5% > 24 months).
- No ₹50,000 interest exemption (which only applies to certain Indian instruments).
A 4.3% US Treasury yield, after Indian tax at 31.2%, is a net 2.96% yield — barely above inflation, often below it.
Problem 4: PPF, EPF, NPS already provide your "bond-like" allocation
Most working Indians already have meaningful exposure to:
- PPF (8%+ effective, tax-free returns).
- EPF (8%+ post-tax returns).
- NPS Tier I (mixed, but bond portion yields well).
- Tax-free bonds (NHAI, REC, etc.) with 7%+ tax-free yields.
These instruments are already better than US bonds in INR terms. You don't need additional bond exposure — and if you do, INR-denominated debt funds are better.
The verdict on US bonds for Indians
Skip them. There's no scenario for a working Indian professional where US bonds outperform Indian fixed-income alternatives after currency and tax. Use PPF/EPF/NPS for the bond allocation; reserve LRS for equity.
The exception: if you're explicitly planning to relocate to the US in the future and want some pre-positioning of USD-denominated stable-yield assets. Even then, US treasuries directly (purchased at TreasuryDirect or via IBKR) might be marginally better than ETFs due to expense ratio.
US REITs: more interesting
What US REITs are
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) are companies that own and operate real estate (residential, commercial, industrial). They pay out 90%+ of their income as dividends to shareholders.
US REIT ETFs (like VNQ, IYR, SCHH) give you exposure to a basket of US REITs.
Why someone might want them
For an Indian investor, US REITs offer:
- Exposure to US commercial real estate (office, residential, data centers, healthcare facilities).
- High income yield (REITs typically yield 3.5–5% in dividends).
- Lower correlation with US equity than direct stocks.
- Diversification beyond Indian real estate (which is your current home/portfolio bias).
The Indian tax angle
REITs are taxed as US foreign equity for Indians:
- Dividends: 25% US withholding under treaty + Indian slab rate − FTC.
- Capital gains: 12.5% LTCG > 24 months, slab < 24 months.
But there's a wrinkle. REITs pay higher dividends than typical equities (3.5–5% vs. 1.3% for VTI). This means:
| VTI | VNQ (REIT ETF) | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual dividend yield | 1.3% | ~3.8% |
| US WH (25%) | ~0.33% drag | ~0.95% drag |
| Indian tax (after FTC for 30% slab) | 0.05% additional | 0.16% additional |
| Total dividend tax friction (annual) | ~0.4% | ~1.1% |
REITs have 3x the dividend tax friction of broad equity ETFs. Over decades, this compounds to a meaningful drag.
When REITs are worth it for Indians
Two cases:
Case 1: You want commercial real estate exposure that India doesn't offer
US REITs cover sectors that Indian REITs (Mindspace, Embassy, Brookfield) don't:
- Data center REITs (Equinix, Digital Realty).
- Healthcare REITs (Welltower, Ventas).
- Specialty REITs (cell towers, timber, self-storage).
If you have a thesis on these specific sectors, US REITs are a way to get exposure.
Case 2: You want income that's USD-denominated for a future expense
If you have known USD-denominated expenses in retirement (international travel, foreign education for kids), REIT dividend income gives you cash flow in USD terms.
When REITs aren't worth it
If you're pursuing pure capital appreciation or building a generic diversified portfolio: skip them. The dividend tax drag eats too much of the return. VTI delivers similar long-term total returns with much less tax friction.
Picks
If you do want US REIT exposure:
- VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF): 0.13% expense ratio, ~3.8% yield, broad US REITs.
- SCHH (Schwab US REIT): 0.07% expense ratio, similar yield, no mortgage REITs.
Allocation if including: 5–10% of US equity portion, no more.
Gold: the most-asked-about, often-misunderstood
What gold ETFs are
Two categories:
- Physical gold ETFs (e.g., GLD, IAU): hold physical gold bullion in vaults. Each share represents a fraction of an ounce.
- Gold miner ETFs (e.g., GDX): hold stocks of companies that mine gold. Different risk profile (more equity-like).
For most retail use cases, physical gold ETFs are what you want.
The Indian context
Indians have a long, complicated relationship with gold. It's:
- Cultural (jewelry, weddings, gifting).
- Inflation hedge.
- Currency hedge.
- Investment.
- Status symbol.
There are also several Indian gold investment vehicles:
- Sovereign Gold Bonds (SGBs): government-issued, redeemable in gold value, 2.5% annual interest, capital gains tax-free if held to maturity.
- Indian gold ETFs (e.g., HDFC Gold ETF): listed on NSE, trade in INR, expense ratios ~0.5%.
- Physical gold and jewelry: traditional, but with making charges and purity issues.
US gold ETFs vs. Indian gold ETFs vs. SGBs
| US gold ETFs (GLD/IAU) | Indian gold ETFs | Sovereign Gold Bonds | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.40% (GLD) / 0.25% (IAU) | 0.4–0.6% | None |
| Returns | Gold price (USD) | Gold price (INR) | Gold price (INR) + 2.5% interest |
| Currency | USD | INR | INR |
| Indian tax (LTCG) | 12.5% (foreign equity) | 12.5% with indexation (after Budget 2024 changes — verify) | Tax-free if held to maturity (8 years) |
| Compliance | Schedule FA | Standard ITR | Standard ITR |
| Liquidity | Excellent (GLD/IAU) | Good | Limited (secondary market thin) |
For most Indian investors, SGBs are clearly the best gold investment vehicle:
- Tax-free at maturity.
- 2.5% annual interest on top of gold price appreciation.
- Government-backed.
- No expense ratio.
US gold ETFs only make sense if:
- You want USD-denominated gold (rare).
- SGBs aren't available (issuance windows are limited).
- You want intra-year liquidity that SGBs can't provide.
For nearly all Indian retail investors: skip US gold ETFs, buy SGBs when available.
The "gold as hedge" question
Gold is sometimes pitched as a recession hedge or inflation hedge. The data is mixed:
- Gold has been a decent inflation hedge over very long horizons (multi-decade).
- In 5–10 year windows, gold can underperform inflation badly (1980s–2000s).
- Gold has shown some negative correlation with equities in crises, but not always.
If you want a "crisis hedge" allocation, 5–10% of net worth in gold (preferably SGBs) is the standard recommendation. More than that becomes a concentrated bet on a single commodity.
A combined recommendation
For an Indian investor wondering whether to add bonds, REITs, or gold to their LRS-based portfolio, here's the structural answer:
| Asset | LRS-based US version | Indian version | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bonds | US Treasury / corporate bond ETFs | PPF, EPF, NPS, debt funds, tax-free bonds | Use Indian alternatives; skip US bonds |
| REITs | VNQ, SCHH | Indian REITs (Embassy, Mindspace) | US REITs only for sector-specific theses (data centers, healthcare); otherwise Indian |
| Gold | GLD, IAU | SGBs, Indian gold ETFs | SGBs are best; skip US gold ETFs |
In all three cases, the Indian alternative is structurally better for an Indian resident than the US version. Use LRS for what it's structurally good at — equity exposure to US-listed companies — and use Indian instruments for the categories where India offers tax-advantaged or yield-superior options.
What about US-listed alternatives that can't be replicated in India?
Some strategies do require LRS-based access:
- Private equity / venture capital (via interval funds or BDCs): Indian retail investors don't have analogous access. Use LRS for these.
- Specific commodity ETFs (uranium, lithium, etc.): not available via Indian platforms.
- Sector-specific REITs as discussed.
- Foreign-currency-denominated bonds for explicit USD pre-positioning if planning to emigrate.
These are niche. For 95%+ of Indian retail investors, the answer for non-equity asset classes is "use Indian instruments, not LRS-based US equivalents."
A worked portfolio
For someone with ₹1 cr of investable assets, a structurally sensible allocation:
| Asset | Amount | Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| Indian equity (large/mid/small) | ₹40 lakh | Nifty 500 + Mid-cap fund |
| US equity | ₹25 lakh | VTI + QQQM |
| International developed equity | ₹5 lakh | VEA |
| Indian fixed income | ₹15 lakh | PPF + EPF + tax-free bonds |
| NPS Tier I | ₹5 lakh | NPS auto choice |
| Gold | ₹5 lakh | Sovereign Gold Bonds |
| Indian REITs | ₹3 lakh | Embassy / Mindspace |
| Cash buffer | ₹2 lakh | Liquid fund |
| Total | ₹1 cr |
Note what's not in this portfolio: US bonds (replaced by PPF/EPF), US gold ETFs (replaced by SGBs), US REITs (replaced by Indian REITs).
The LRS exposure is purely equity, where the structural reasons to use LRS are strongest.
The summary
For Indian retail investors:
- US bonds: skip. Use PPF/EPF/NPS for fixed income.
- US REITs: only if you specifically want sector exposures that Indian REITs don't offer.
- US gold ETFs: skip. SGBs are structurally better.
LRS is a precious resource (USD 250k/year limit, 20% TCS friction above ₹10 lakh). Spend it on the asset class where it has the strongest structural benefit: equity in companies that don't exist on Indian exchanges. Don't waste LRS on bonds, REITs, or gold where Indian alternatives are better.
Get more like this in your inbox
One practical post a week on US investing & RSU strategy.
Keep reading
3-fund portfolio for Indian residents: US, intl & Indian equity
The simplest globally diversified portfolio for Indians: one Indian index fund, one US ETF, one international ETF. Tax-aware, low-cost.
Should you sell RSUs at vest or hold? Framework for Indians
Sell RSUs at vest, or hold for upside? The right answer depends on concentration, tax timing, and what you'll do with the cash.
Welcome to Vested: US investing & RSUs for Indians
Vested is a publication on US investing and RSU management, written for Indian residents who deserve better than American advice.